Cases Quote by Edward Snowden
“Going all the way back to Daniel Ellsberg, it is clear that the government is not concerned with damage to national security, because in none of these cases was there damage.”
About This Quote
Source Interview: 2013, The Guardian, Snowden disclosures
The government claims security concerns but often lacks evidence of actual harm.
In simple terms: Government cites security without proof of damage.
Key Takeaway
Question official motives.
Themes
government
security
accountability
Mood
skeptical
critical
Type
political
explanatory
When to use this quote
- whistleblowing
- policy debate
- public trust
- media scrutiny
Key Concepts
political power
transparency
Questions to Reflect On
- How do we verify security threats?
- What safeguards prevent abuse?
A Different Perspective
Security claims can be used to justify overreach.
![“[Brazil] went to the UN and said, "We need new standards for this." We need to take a look at what they're calling "data sovereignty."” quote by Edward Snowden](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/af7/edward-snowden-555_brazil_brazil-went-to-the-un-and-said-we-need-n_14906.jpg)
![“There was a real choice when [Barack Obama] became president. It was a very difficult choice - to say, "We're not going to hold senior officials to account with the same laws that every other citizen in the country is held to," or "This is a nation that believes in the rule of law."” quote by Edward Snowden](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/104/edward-snowden-555_accounts_there-was-a-real-choice-when-barack-obam_27838.jpg)
![“[As in the case of] alcohol prohibition, illegality has driven organized crime, sent countless people to jail, and killed many thousands. Repression does not work.” quote by Sam Branson](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/212/sam-branson-36458_alcohol_as-in-the-case-of-alcohol-prohibition-il_8703.jpg)
