Skip to content

Aquinas Quote by Edward Feser

“Dawkins’s problem is that he doesn’t know the difference between probabilistic empirical theorizing and strict metaphysical demonstration, and thus misreads an attempt at the latter as if it were the former. That is not to say that Aquinas might not be mistaken at some point in the argument –…” quote by Edward Feser
Download Open image
“Dawkins’s problem is that he doesn’t know the difference between probabilistic empirical theorizing and strict metaphysical demonstration, and thus misreads an attempt at the latter as if it were the former. That is not to say that Aquinas might not be mistaken at some point in the argument – though obviously I don’t think he is – but if you’re going to show that he is, you first need to understand what kind of argument he is giving, and thus what kind of mistake he’d be making if he’s made one at all.”

Edward Feser

About This Quote

Source Book: The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, 2005

Confusing statistical inference with philosophical proof leads to misreading arguments and attributing errors incorrectly.

In simple terms: Mixing empirical and metaphysical reasoning causes misunderstanding.

Key Takeaway

Distinguish evidence types before critiquing.

Themes

philosophy logic argumentation

Mood

analytical critical

Type

philosophical academic

When to use this quote

  • academic debate
  • philosophical critique
  • theology discussion
  • science vs religion dialogue

Key Concepts

probabilistic reasoning metaphysical demonstration argument analysis

Questions to Reflect On

  • How do you tell empirical from metaphysical claims?
  • What risks arise from conflating the two?
A Different Perspective

Overemphasis on categorization may overlook nuanced positions.

2.6 out of 5 (8 ratings)

More by Edward Feser

Explore all 9 Edward Feser quotes

More Aquinas quotes

Browse all 7 Aquinas quotes