Capital-accumulation Quote by David Harvey
““The main substantive achievement of neoliberalization, however, has been to redistribute, rather than to generate, wealth and income. …[T]his was achieved under the rubric of ‘accumulation by dispossession’. By this I mean the continuation and proliferation of accumulation practices which Marx had treated of as ‘primitive’ or ‘original’ during the rise of capitalism. These include the commodification and privatization of land and the forceful expulsion of peasant populations (compare the cases, described above, of Mexico and of China, where 70 million peasants are thought to have been displaced in recent times); conversion of various forms of property rights (common, collective, state, etc.) into exclusive private property rights (most spectacularly represented by China); suppression of rights to the commons; commodification of labour power and the suppression of alternative (indigenous) forms of production and consumption; colonial, neocolonial, and imperial processes of appropriation of assets (including natural resources); monetization of exchange and taxation, particularly of land; the slave trade (which continues particularly in the sex industry); and usury, the national debt and, most devastating of all, the use of the credit system as a radical means of accumulation by dispossession.””
About This Quote
Source Book: A Brief History of Neoliberalism, 2005
Neoliberal policies shift wealth by dispossessing people rather than creating new value, using tactics like privatization and commodification.
In simple terms: Neoliberalism moves wealth through taking assets, not making new ones.
Recognize and challenge dispossession mechanisms.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- policy analysis
- activist organizing
- academic research
- community advocacy
- legal reform
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How do we balance necessary economic growth with protecting communal rights?
- What alternatives exist to prevent dispossession while fostering development?
Neoliberalism can also fund public services and infrastructure, complicating its critique.