Civil war Quote by Daron Acemoğlu
““NATIONS FAIL TODAY because their extractive economic institutions do not create the incentives needed for people to save, invest, and innovate. Extractive political institutions support these economic institutions by cementing the power of those who benefit from the extraction. Extractive economic and political institutions, though their details vary under different circumstances, are always at the root of this failure. In many cases, for example, as we will see in Argentina, Colombia, and Egypt, this failure takes the form of lack of sufficient economic activity, because the politicians are just too happy to extract resources or quash any type of independent economic activity that threatens themselves and the economic elites. In some extreme cases, as in Zimbabwe and Sierra Leone, which we discuss next, extractive institutions pave the way for complete state failure, destroying not only law and order but also even the most basic economic incentives. The result is economic stagnation and—as the recent history of Angola, Cameroon, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Haiti, Liberia, Nepal, Sierra Leone, Sudan, and Zimbabwe illustrates—civil wars, mass displacements, famines, and epidemics, making many of these countries poorer today than they were in the 1960s. A””
About This Quote
Source Book: Economic Origins of Political Systems, Daron Acemoğlu, 2020
Extractive institutions concentrate power, discouraging investment and innovation, leading to economic stagnation and conflict.
In simple terms: When power is hoarded, economies suffer and societies destabilize.
Reform institutions to broaden incentives and reduce extraction.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- policy reform
- anti‑corruption measures
- inclusive governance
- foreign aid design
- civil society empowerment
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- What incentives can be created to align elite interests with broader prosperity?
- How can international actors support institutional change without fostering dependency?
Even with reforms, entrenched elites may resist change, limiting impact.