Skip to content

Nuclear Quote by Daniel Ellsberg

“York posed the question, how many nuclear weapons are needed to deter an adversary rational enough to be deterred? Concurring with Bundy’s judgment—as who would not?—he answered his question, “somewhere in the range of 1, 10, or 100 … closer to 1 than it is to 100.” In 1986, the U.S. had 23,317…” quote by Daniel Ellsberg
Download Open image
““York posed the question, how many nuclear weapons are needed to deter an adversary rational enough to be deterred? Concurring with Bundy’s judgment—as who would not?—he answered his question, “somewhere in the range of 1, 10, or 100 … closer to 1 than it is to 100.” In 1986, the U.S. had 23,317 nuclear warheads and Russia had 40,159, for a total of 63,836 weapons.76””

Daniel Ellsberg

About This Quote

Source Speech: Interview on nuclear deterrence, 1986

The quote questions the minimal number of nuclear weapons needed for effective deterrence, suggesting a small arsenal can suffice against a rational adversary.

In simple terms: Few nukes may deter a rational opponent.

Key Takeaway

Consider the balance between deterrence and disarmament.

Themes

deterrence nuclear strategy policy risk management

Mood

cautious analytical

Type

strategic political

When to use this quote

  • defense planning
  • international negotiations
  • arms control discussions
  • military budgeting

Key Concepts

game theory mutually assured destruction strategic stability

Questions to Reflect On

  • How many weapons are truly needed for security?
  • What risks arise from minimal deterrence?
A Different Perspective

Assumes rationality of adversaries, which may not hold in all contexts.

4.1 out of 5 (4 ratings)

More by Daniel Ellsberg

Explore all 58 Daniel Ellsberg quotes

More Nuclear quotes

Browse all 2,074 Nuclear quotes