Arrogance Quote by Christopher Zeeman
“The scientist has to take 95 per cent of his subject on trust. He has to because he can't possibly do all the experiments, therefore he has to take on trust the experiments all his colleagues and predecessors have done. Whereas a mathematician doesn't have to take anything on trust. Any theorem that's proved, he doesn't believe it, really, until he goes through the proof himself, and therefore he knows his whole subject from scratch. He's absolutely 100 per cent certain of it. And that gives him an extraordinary conviction of certainty, and an arrogance that scientists don't have.”
About This Quote
Scientists rely on trust in prior work and peer results, while mathematicians demand personal verification, leading to differing confidence levels and perceived arrogance.
In simple terms: Science trusts others; math demands personal proof.
Trust vs. proof in knowledge disciplines.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- research methodology training
- interdisciplinary collaboration
- academic ethics workshops
Key Concepts
Practical Applications
- balance trust with critical replication in scientific practice
Questions to Reflect On
- How does trust shape scientific progress?
- Can mathematicians achieve absolute certainty in practice?
The dichotomy oversimplifies; many scientists verify key results, and mathematicians also rely on community consensus.