Character Quote by Christopher Hitchens
““I know not how I contrived to get the subject of immortality introduced. He said he never had entertained any belief in religion since he began to read Locke and Clarke. I asked him if he was not religious when he was young. He said he was, and he used to read The Whole Duty of Man; that he made an abstract from the catalogue of vices at the end of it, and examined himself by this, leaving out murder and theft and such vices as he had no chance of committing, having no inclination to commit them. This, he said, was strange work; for instance, to try if, notwithstanding his excelling his schoolfellows, he had no pride or vanity. He smiled in ridicule of this as absurd and contrary to fixed principles and necessary consequences, not adverting that religious discipline does not mean to extinguish, but to moderate, the passions; and certainly an excess of pride or vanity is dangerous and generally hurtful. He then said flatly that the morality of every religion was bad, and, I really thought, was not jocular when he said that when he heard a man was religious, he concluded he was a rascal, though he had known some instances of very good men being religious. This was just an extravagant reverse of the common remark as to infidels.””
About This Quote
Source Essay: God Is Not Great, 2007
He critiques religious morality, arguing that religious discipline moderates passions but can also foster pride, vanity, and hypocrisy, and that morality can exist without religion.
In simple terms: Religion’s moral claims are flawed.
Question secular ethics.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- debate on ethics
- personal moral code
- public policy
- education curricula
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- Can morality be fully secular?
- What are the limits of religious discipline?
Overgeneralizing all religious individuals as immoral.