Cases Quote by Alan Dershowitz
“In the Pentagon Papers case, the government asserted in the Supreme Court that the publication of the material was a threat to national security. It turned out it was not a threat to U.S. security. But even if it had been, that doesn't mean that it couldn't be published.”
About This Quote
Source Court case: New York Times Co. v. United States, 1971
Legal precedent shows that even if information threatens security, it may still be published under free speech.
In simple terms: Security concerns don’t automatically block publication.
Key Takeaway
Uphold press freedom despite security claims.
Themes
free speech
press freedom
government transparency
Mood
critical
analytical
Type
legal
political
When to use this quote
- journalistic investigations
- whistleblower disclosures
- public interest reporting
Key Concepts
first amendment
national security law
Questions to Reflect On
- When should national security override press freedom?
- How to assess genuine threats?
A Different Perspective
Security arguments can be misused to suppress truth.
![“[As in the case of] alcohol prohibition, illegality has driven organized crime, sent countless people to jail, and killed many thousands. Repression does not work.” quote by Sam Branson](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/212/sam-branson-36458_alcohol_as-in-the-case-of-alcohol-prohibition-il_8703.jpg)
