The big difference between animal liberation activists and other so-called 'terrorists' is the targets; no innocent victims are ever targeted in animal lib campaigns. If you are not abusing and exploiting animals, there is no need to fear for one's… — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
It won't ruin our movement if someone gets killed in an animal rights action. It's going to happen sooner or later. The Animal Liberation… — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
Whatever it takes to stop someone from abusing animals is certainly morally acceptable — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
If someone is killing, on a regular basis, thousands of animals, and if that person can only be stopped in one way by the… — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
I am personally not advocating violence. I am simply saying that it is a morally acceptable tactic and it may be useful in the… — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
I think Dario Ringach is a poster boy for the concept that the use of force or the threat of force is an effective… — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
And I don't think you'd have to kill -- assassinate -- too many vivisectors before you would see a marked decrease in the amount… — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
Nothing is more violent and radical than what's being done to non-human animals in our society. If a researcher won't stop abusing animals and… — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
I think for five lives, 10 lives, 15 human lives, we could save a million, two million, 10 million non-human lives. — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
If that means going onto their farms, releasing their animals and burning the place to the ground, that's morally justifiable, in our opinion...There were… — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
If animal abusers aren't going to stop perpetrating these types of atrocities, they ought to be stopped using whatever means necessary. What we're starting… — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
I think that violence and nonviolence are not moral principles, they’re tactics. — Jerry Vlasak Copy Share Image
