If you are doing a peer review of somebody's paper before publication, the editor would not allow you to speculate about the person's motives, about their place in the hierarchy. It's not scientifically relevant. — Susan Fiske Copy Share Image
If people are going to do post-publication peer review, they need to abide by the same rules as they abide by for pre-publication peer… — Susan Fiske Copy Share Image
In these unfiltered, un-moderated social media posts people are speculating about others' motivations. And you could no more put that in a peer review… — Susan Fiske Copy Share Image
If you are doing a peer review of somebody's paper before publication, the editor would not allow you to speculate about the person's motives,… — Susan Fiske Copy Share Image
Promoting open and critical and respectful scientific discourse seems like a pretty good goal to me. — Susan Fiske Copy Share Image
If you have an effect that nobody can replicate, then your phenomenon fades away. So if you want to to have a legacy, then… — Susan Fiske Copy Share Image
I think there's a huge difference between describing norms in a vivid way and singling out individual people. — Susan Fiske Copy Share Image
Some people have set up sort of "gotcha" algorithms that apparently crawl through psychology articles and look for fraudulent p-values [a measure of the… — Susan Fiske Copy Share Image
![“Some people have set up sort of "gotcha" algorithms that apparently crawl through psychology articles and look for fraudulent p-values [a measure of the likelihood that experimental results weren't a fluke]. But they're including rounding errors that don't change the significance levels of the…” quote by Susan Fiske](https://sms4smile.com/quotes/img-quotes/5b1/susan-fiske-46605_algorithms_some-people-have-set-up-sort-of-gotcha-a_2326797.jpg)
