When objects are presented within the context of art (and until recently objects always have been used) they are as eligible for aesthetic consideration as are any objects in the world, and an aesthetic consideration of an object existing in… — Joseph Kosuth Copy Share Image
Anything can be art. Art is the relations between relations, not the relations between objects. — Joseph Kosuth Copy Share Image
That celebrated marriage of science and art, photography, seemed at the time to join together how we look at the world, art, with how… — Joseph Kosuth Copy Share Image
Forget your ideas about art. Make a shopping list of everything you like about what you've done. Include qualities that you've seen in your… — Joseph Kosuth Copy Share Image
I liked that the work itself was something other than simply what you saw It meant you could have an art work which was… — Joseph Kosuth Copy Share Image
Making something new to look at is a futile and empty act if its only audience is the eyes. — Joseph Kosuth Copy Share Image
Unlike the marks of a painting, the photo seems to organize its 'opinions' in relation to the world; even when the photographs have clearly… — Joseph Kosuth Copy Share Image
When objects are presented within the context of art (and until recently objects always have been used) they are as eligible for aesthetic consideration… — Joseph Kosuth Copy Share Image
Photography, as an invention, was both art and science. The view it gave us of the world was in some measure acceptable because it… — Joseph Kosuth Copy Share Image
“The 'value' of particular artists after Duchamp can be weighed according to how much they questioned the nature of art.” — Joseph Kosuth Copy Share Image
All art (after Duchamp) is conceptual (in nature) because art only exists conceptually. — Joseph Kosuth Copy Share Image
