What a thing is and what it means are not separate, the former being physical and the latter mental as we are accustomed to believe. — James J. Gibson Copy Share Image
There has been a great gulf in psychological thought between the perception of space and objects on one hand and the perception of meaning… — James J. Gibson Copy Share Image
The human young must learn to perceive these affordances, in some degree at least, but the young of some animals do not have time… — James J. Gibson Copy Share Image
The perception of what a thing is and the perception of what it means are not separate, either. — James J. Gibson Copy Share Image
Psychology is still trying to explain the perception of the position of an object in space, along with its shape, size, and so on,… — James J. Gibson Copy Share Image
I also assume that they are not simply the physical properties of things as now conceived by physical science. Instead, they are ecological, in… — James J. Gibson Copy Share Image
What a thing is and what it means are not separate, the former being physical and the latter mental as we are accustomed to… — James J. Gibson Copy Share Image
The heart of the problem is not so much how we see objects in depth, as how we see the constant layout of the… — James J. Gibson Copy Share Image
A mechanical encounter or other energy-exchange may cause tissue damage. — James J. Gibson Copy Share Image
The abstract analysis of the world by mathematics and physics rests on the concepts of space and time. — James J. Gibson Copy Share Image
