Napster's only alleged liability is for contributory or vicarious infringement. So when Napster's users engage in noncommercial sharing of music, is that activity copyright infringement? No. — David Boies Copy Share Image
Napster's only alleged liability is for contributory or vicarious infringement. So when Napster's users engage in noncommercial sharing of music, is that activity copyright… — David Boies Copy Share Image
I was a paper boy, beginning the summer between my fourth-grade and fifth-grade years. — David Boies Copy Share Image
I think what it was about was the people's right to vote and have those votes counted. And if you think back through our… — David Boies Copy Share Image
It was important for the Supreme Court to say it’s a matter of constitutional law that everyone is equal, to say everyone is entitled… — David Boies Copy Share Image
The very purpose of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution is to protect minority rights against majority voters. Every court decision that strikes… — David Boies Copy Share Image
My question is what non-Microsoft browsers were you concerned about in January of 1996. — David Boies Copy Share Image
The Audio Home Recording Act directly says that noncommercial copying by consumers is lawful. — David Boies Copy Share Image
You never know when you lose a case whether it was because the facts were against you, or because the judges had already made… — David Boies Copy Share Image
When you think of Napster, you think of music. But the first thing that struck me was that this was an important case not… — David Boies Copy Share Image
