The problem with allowing God a role in the history of life is not that science would cease, but rather that scientists would have to acknowledge the existence of something important which is outside the boundaries of natural science. — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
“Darvinizam je priča o oslobađanju čovječanstva od iluzije da njegovom sudbinom upravlja neka sila viša od njega.” — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
In short, the proposition that God was in any way involved in our creation is effectively outlawed, and implicitly negated. — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
First, Darwinian theory tells us how a certain amount of diversity in life forms can develop once we have various types of complex living… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
Evolutionary biologists are not content merely to explain how variation occurs within limits, however. They aspire to answer a much broader question-which is how… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
Materialism sets us free from sin-by proving that there is no such thing as sin. There's just antisocial behavior, which we can control with… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
In short, it is not that evolutionary naturalists have been less brazen than the scientific creationists in holding science hostage, but rather that they… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
“As students grow more and more accustomed to assuming materialism and naturalism in their academic work, the concept of creation by God gradually tends… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
Although I insist that God has always had the power to intervene directly in nature to create new forms, I am willing to be… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
“A second point that caught my attention was that the very persons who insist upon keeping religion and science separate are eager to use… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
Modernism is typically defined as the condition that begins when people realize God is truly dead, and we are therefore on our own. — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
“..."science" as defined in our culture has a philosophical bias that needs to be exposed. On the one hand, science is empirical. This means… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
Scientists have long known that Darwinism is false. They have adhered to the myth out of self-interest and a zealous desire to put down… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
“The whole thing seems absurdly easy - so easy that you ought to smell a rat.” — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
The Intelligent Design movement starts with the recognition that "In the beginning was the Word," and "In the beginning God created." Establishing that point… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
Most importantly, I agree that the truth of these matters should be determined by interpretation of scientific evidence - experiments, fossil studies and the… — Phillip E. Johnson Copy Share Image
