A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one…
“A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the highest virtues of a good citizen, but it is not the highest. The laws of necessity, of self-preservation, of saving our country when in danger, are of higher obligation. To lose our country by a scrupulous adherence to written law would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property and all those who are enjoying them with us; thus absurdly sacrificing the end to the means.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Legal obedience is vital, but higher moral duties can supersede written law when essential for survival and liberty.
In simple terms: Higher duties can outweigh strict law.
Key Takeaway
Balance law with moral necessity.
Themes
law
morality
citizenship
duty
Mood
thoughtful
serious
Type
political
ethical
When to use this quote
- wartime decisions
- civil disobedience
- emergency governance
- human rights
Key Concepts
ethics
political philosophy
Questions to Reflect On
- When should law yield to higher moral goals?
- What risks arise from prioritizing necessity over law?
A Different Perspective
Strict law may ignore urgent moral imperatives.