How can you claim infallibility and claim that in these…
![“How can you claim infallibility and claim that in these 114 [drone] strikes there was just one mistake -- one person killed that was a civilian -- and at the same time say, 'Well, we don't really know how many people were killed or who they were, but we know they weren't civilians'? I don't know…” quote by Richard Engel](https://sms4smile.com/q/img-quotes/1e0/richard-engel-3133_can-do_how-can-you-claim-infallibility-and-clai_2905561.jpg)
“How can you claim infallibility and claim that in these 114 [drone] strikes there was just one mistake -- one person killed that was a civilian -- and at the same time say, 'Well, we don't really know how many people were killed or who they were, but we know they weren't civilians'? I don't know how you can do that.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The speaker questions contradictory statements about civilian casualties in drone strikes, highlighting logical inconsistency.
In simple terms: Contradictory claims about civilian deaths.
Key Takeaway
Demand consistent evidence and accountability.
Themes
ethics
military
accountability
Mood
critical
skeptical
Type
political
analytical
When to use this quote
- policy debate
- media analysis
- human rights advocacy
Key Concepts
logic
cognitive dissonance
Questions to Reflect On
- How can officials reconcile conflicting statements?
- What mechanisms ensure accurate reporting?
A Different Perspective
Such claims can undermine credibility and public trust.