I was less angry at [Carl] Armstrong, though I was angry…
![“I was less angry at [Carl] Armstrong, though I was angry at the people who came to his trial: Dan Ellsberg, who ordinarily I respected a lot; Philip Berrigan; the guy who teaches at Princeton still - I can't remember his name. And they were saying - well, they were saying, really, what Arthur…” quote by Nat Hentoff](https://sms4smile.com/q/i/162/nat-hentoff-1615_angry_i-was-less-angry-at-carl-armstrong-thoug_2131420.jpg)
“I was less angry at [Carl] Armstrong, though I was angry at the people who came to his trial: Dan Ellsberg, who ordinarily I respected a lot; Philip Berrigan; the guy who teaches at Princeton still - I can't remember his name. And they were saying - well, they were saying, really, what Arthur Koestler had people saying on "Darkness at Noon." The means were unfortunate and, sadly, someone died, but the end is what is important and this was a great symbolic - something or other - sign against the war in Vietnam.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The narrator reflects on anger directed at individuals versus systemic injustice, referencing historical dissent and anti‑war sentiment.
In simple terms: Anger at people vs. war injustice.
Key Takeaway
Focus on systemic change.
Themes
justice
war
historical protest
anger
Mood
thoughtful
critical
Type
historical
political
When to use this quote
- protest movements
- legal trials
- public discourse
- education programs
Key Concepts
political activism
moral philosophy
Questions to Reflect On
- How can personal grievances be redirected?
- What lessons from past protests apply today?
A Different Perspective
Personal anger may distract from broader issues.