Skip to content

The nihilistic doctrine is stated not only in the various…

“The nihilistic doctrine is stated not only in the various Prajnya-sutras (the books having Prajnya-paramita in their titles), but also in almost all Mahayana sutras. The above-mentioned three doctrines were preached (by the Buddha) in the three successive periods. But this doctrine was not…” quote by Kaiten Nukariya
Download Open image
““The nihilistic doctrine is stated not only in the various Prajnya-sutras (the books having Prajnya-paramita in their titles), but also in almost all Mahayana sutras. The above-mentioned three doctrines were preached (by the Buddha) in the three successive periods. But this doctrine was not preached at any particular period; it was intended to destroy at any time the attachment to the phenomenal objects. Therefore Nagarjuna tells us that there are two sorts of Prajnyas, the Common and the Special. The Çravakas (lit., hearers) and the Pratyekabuddhas (lit., singly enlightened ones), or the Hinayanists, could hear and believe in, with the Bodhisattvas or the Mahayanists, the Common Prajnya, as it was intended to destroy their attachment to the external objects. Bodhisattvas alone could understand the Special Prajnya, as it secretly revealed the Buddha nature, or the Absolute. Each of the two great Indian teachers, Çilabhadra and Jnyanaprabha, divided the whole teachings of the Buddha into three periods. (According to Çilabhadra, A.D. 625, teacher of Hiuen Tsang, the Buddha first preached the doctrine of 'existence' to the effect that every living being is unreal, but things are real. All the Hinayana sutras belong to this period. Next the Buddha preached the doctrine of the middle path, in Samdhi-nirmocana-sutra and others, to the effect that all the phenomenal universe is unreal, but that the mental substance is real. According to Jnyanaprabha, the Buddha first preached the doctrine of existence, next that of the existence of mental substance, and lastly that of unreality.) One says the doctrine of unreality was preached before that of Dharma-laksana, while the others say it was preached after. Here I adopt the latters' opinion." If””

Kaiten Nukariya

About This Quote

This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.

The passage explains that Buddhist teachings on emptiness and non‑attachment were presented in multiple phases, with a deeper “Special” insight reserved for advanced practitioners.

In simple terms: Buddhist teachings on emptiness were taught in stages, with deeper insight for bodhisattvas.

Key Takeaway

Study the progressive layers of doctrine to deepen insight.

Themes

Buddhism emptiness non‑attachment spiritual development

Mood

contemplative inquisitive

Type

scriptural philosophical

When to use this quote

  • Meditation practice
  • scholarly study
  • teaching seminars
  • interfaith dialogue

Key Concepts

Madhyamaka Prajna Bodhisattva ideal

Questions to Reflect On

  • How does one recognize the “Special” insight in daily life?
  • Can the “Common” teachings lead to the same liberation?
A Different Perspective

The distinction between “Common” and “Special” insight may be overly hierarchical, limiting accessibility.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ No ratings yet

More by Kaiten Nukariya

Explore all 367 Kaiten Nukariya quotes

More Books quotes

Browse all 59,485 Books quotes