Gutberlet rightly observes: " It were mere quibbling to…
““Gutberlet rightly observes: " It were mere quibbling to try to disprove the idea of a mystically real separation by saying that the words of Consecration do not result in a separation of the Blood from the Body, and to contend that they have not this exclusive sense. . . . This is true to a certain extent,— if but one element were consecrated, especially if that one element were the bread, no separation would ensue. . . . But since the Blood is consecrated apart from the Body of Christ, the Blood must be conceived as existing without the Body, and the Body without the Blood; and as the words of Consecration are calculated, to effect this double repres entation, they are calculated to exclude the Body from””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The quote argues that consecration creates a real, mystical separation between Christ’s Body and Blood, not merely symbolic.
In simple terms: Consecration makes Body and Blood truly distinct.
Key Takeaway
Recognize symbolic depth in sacramental rites.
Themes
theacrament
theology
symbolism
Mood
contemplative
serious
Type
theological
philosophical
When to use this quote
- church liturgy
- personal devotion
- academic study
- interfaith dialogue
Key Concepts
Eucharistic theology
metaphysics
Questions to Reflect On
- How does this view affect personal faith?
- What implications does it have for ecumenical dialogue?
A Different Perspective
The claim may be contested by those who view sacraments symbolically.