No, I didn't. But I was aware that I was embarked on an…
““No, I didn't. But I was aware that I was embarked on an epic. In the case of the Bradstreet poem, I didn't know. The situation with that poem was this. I invented the stanza in '48 and wrote the first stanza and the first three lines of the second stanza, and then I stuck. I had in mind a poem roughly the same length as another of mine, “The Statue”—about seven or eight stanzas of eight lines each. Then I stuck. I read and read and read and thought and collected notes and sketched for five years until, although I was still in the second stanza, I had a mountain of notes and draftings—no whole stanzas, but passages as long as five lines. The whole poem was written in about two months, after which I was a ruin for two years. When I finally got going, I had this incredible mass of stuff and a very good idea of the shape of the poem, with the exception of one crucial point, which was this. I'll tell you in a minute why and how I got going. The great exception was this: It did not occur to me to have a dialogue between them—to insert bodily Henry into the poem . . . Me, to insert me, in my own person, John Berryman, I, into the poem . . .””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The poet describes a prolonged, fragmented creative process, eventual breakthrough, and the realization of self‑insertion as a narrative device.
In simple terms: A long, stuck writing period ended when the poet added his own voice to the poem.
Allow personal perspective to shape your work.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- writing a long poem
- overcoming writer’s block
- integrating self into art
- drafting over years
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How does inserting yourself change a poem’s impact?
- When is authorial presence appropriate?
Self‑insertion may limit universality of the poem.