That strain of anti-monopoly crusading egalitarianism…
![“That strain of anti-monopoly crusading egalitarianism really runs throughout American history from [Tomas] Jefferson to Woodrow Wilson, that finds its apotheosis in [Louis] Brandeis, continues through the New Deal, but then it sort of peters out in the '60s because progressives in particular…” quote by Jeffrey Rosen](https://sms4smile.com/q/img-quotes/558/jeffrey-rosen-13180_american-history_that-strain-of-anti-monopoly-crusading-e_1868677.jpg)
“That strain of anti-monopoly crusading egalitarianism really runs throughout American history from [Tomas] Jefferson to Woodrow Wilson, that finds its apotheosis in [Louis] Brandeis, continues through the New Deal, but then it sort of peters out in the '60s because progressives in particular become more interested in extending equality to minorities, and women, and other excluded groups, and little more suspicious of these old white guys, often from the south, who were crusaders against monopolies.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The tradition of anti‑monopoly egalitarianism has been a recurring American theme, peaking with Brandeis and the New Deal, then waning as progressives shifted focus to civil rights and minority equality, growing wary of historic white reformers.
In simple terms: Anti‑monopoly ideals were strong, then faded as focus shifted to civil rights.
Key Takeaway
Recognize how social movements evolve and re‑evaluate past allies.
Themes
history
politics
social change
progressivism
antitrust
Mood
reflective
critical
thoughtful
Type
analytical
historical
When to use this quote
- policy debates
- academic research
- activist strategy
- public discourse
- education
Key Concepts
egalitarianism
class analysis
civil rights
historical cycles
Questions to Reflect On
- How can modern reformers balance economic and social justice?
- What lessons from past anti‑monopoly efforts apply today?
A Different Perspective
The shift may overlook ongoing economic concentration and its impact on equality.