should a legislator, wishing to impose a new tax, choose…
““should a legislator, wishing to impose a new tax, choose that which would be theoretically the most just? By no means. In practice the most unjust may be the best for the masses. Should it at the same time be the least obvious, and apparently the least burdensome, it will be the most easily tolerated. It is for this reason that an indirect tax, however exorbitant it be, will always be accepted by the crowd, because, being paid daily in fractions of a farthing on objects of consumption, it will not interfere with the habits of the crowd, and will pass unperceived. Replace it by a proportional tax on wages or income of any other kind, to be paid in a lump sum, and were this new imposition theoretically ten times less burdensome than the other, it would give rise to unanimous protest. This arises from the fact that a sum relatively high, which will appear immense, and will in consequence strike the imagination, has been substituted for the unperceived fractions of a farthing. The new tax would only appear light had it been saved farthing by farthing, but this economic proceeding involves an amount of foresight of which the masses are incapable.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Indirect, small taxes are accepted because they blend into daily habits, while obvious, lump‑sum taxes provoke protest despite being fairer.
In simple terms: People tolerate hidden taxes but reject obvious ones.
Design policies that align with habit perception.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- tax reform
- public budgeting
- consumer pricing
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How do you feel about unnoticed fees?
- Can fairness outweigh perception in policy?
Hidden costs can erode trust if discovered.