Skip to content

A confidential report delivered in June 1965 by Abel…

“A confidential report delivered in June 1965 by Abel Aganbegyan, director of the Novobirsk Institute of Economics, highlighted the difficulties. Aganbegyan noted that the growth rate of the Soviet economy was beginning to decline, just as the rival US economy seemed particularly buoyant; at the…” quote by Geoffrey Hosking
Download Open image
““A confidential report delivered in June 1965 by Abel Aganbegyan, director of the Novobirsk Institute of Economics, highlighted the difficulties. Aganbegyan noted that the growth rate of the Soviet economy was beginning to decline, just as the rival US economy seemed particularly buoyant; at the same time, some sectors of the Soviet economy - housing, agriculture, services, retail trade - remained very backward, and were failing to develop at an adequate rate. The root causes of this poor performance he saw in the enormous commitment of resources to defense (in human terms, 30-40 million people out of a working population of 100 million, he reckoned), and the 'extreme centralism and lack of democracy in economic matters' which had survived from the past. In a complex modern society, he argued, not everything could be planned, since it was impossible to foresee all possible contingencies and their potential effects. So the plan amounted to central command, and even that could not be properly implemented for lack of information and of modern data-processing equipment. 'The Central Statistical Administration ... does not have a single computer, and is not planning to acquire any,' he commented acidly. Economic administration was also impeded by excessive secrecy: 'We obtain many figures... from American journals sooner than they are released by the Central Statistical Administration.' Hence the economy suffered from inbuilt distortions: the hoarding of goods and labour to provide for unforeseen contingencies, the production of shoddy goods to fulfill planning targets expressed in crude quantitative terms, the accumulation of unused money by a public reluctant to buy substandard products, with resultant inflation and a flourishing black market.””

Geoffrey Hosking

About This Quote

This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.

The Soviet economy faltered due to over‑militarization, central planning, secrecy, and lack of data, causing inefficiencies and black markets.

In simple terms: Heavy defense spending and centralism hurt Soviet economy.

Key Takeaway

Balance resources, improve data, and allow market flexibility.

Themes

economics central planning resource allocation inefficiency political economy

Mood

critical analytical historical

Type

Communism:1 Economics:1 Modern society:1 Poor performance:1 Russia:1 Soviet union:1 Soviet Economy:1 Administration Economy:1 Economic Administration:1 Difficulties Aganbegyan:1 Aganbegyan Noted:1

When to use this quote

  • policy analysis
  • historical study
  • economic forecasting
  • development strategy
  • education curricula

Key Concepts

command economy information scarcity bureaucratic inertia industrial policy economic reform

Questions to Reflect On

  • What modern economies rely heavily on central planning?
  • How can data transparency improve economic outcomes?
A Different Perspective

Central planning can sometimes achieve rapid mobilization despite inefficiencies.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ No ratings yet

More Communism quotes

Browse all 1,510 Communism quotes