Judge [Gonzalo] Curiel has not said anything, and in fact…
![“Judge [Gonzalo] Curiel has not said anything, and in fact, cannot say anything. But I would even broaden it out to, you know, judges who are victims of attack ads in say state Supreme Court elections can't talk back. Judges are really barred from commenting on this kind of huge public hue and cry.” quote by Dahlia Lithwick](https://sms4smile.com/q/img-quotes/77c/dahlia-lithwick-17366_ads_judge-gonzalo-curiel-has-not-said-anythi_1541108.jpg)
“Judge [Gonzalo] Curiel has not said anything, and in fact, cannot say anything. But I would even broaden it out to, you know, judges who are victims of attack ads in say state Supreme Court elections can't talk back. Judges are really barred from commenting on this kind of huge public hue and cry.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Judges are prohibited from speaking about political attacks against them, limiting public discourse.
In simple terms: Judges cannot comment on attack ads.
Key Takeaway
Recognize the impact of silencing judicial voices.
Themes
judicial ethics
free speech
politics
media
accountability
Mood
concerned
critical
Type
analytical
commentary
When to use this quote
- court elections
- media scrutiny
- public statements
- legal advocacy
Key Concepts
judicial independence
public perception
political pressure
Questions to Reflect On
- How does restricting judges’ speech affect public trust?
- What alternatives exist for judges to address attacks?
A Different Perspective
Silencing may protect impartiality but reduces transparency.