Judaism Quote by Simon Schama
““The existence of a temple of YHWH in Upper Egypt means one of two things for our understanding of what Jews were like at this embryonic moment in their collective existence. Either they were pre-biblical, aware only of some of the legal codes of the Torah and some of the elements of the founding epic, but had not yet taken in Deuteronomy, the book written two centuries earlier, ostensibly the 120-year-old dying Moses’ spoken legacy to the Israelites, which codified more rigorously the much looser and often contradictory injunctions of Leviticus. Or the Elephantine Jews did have the Mosaic strictures of Deuteronomy, and perhaps even knew all about the reforms of kings Hezekiah and his great-grandson Josiah making the Jerusalem Temple the sole place of sacrificial ritual and pilgrimage, but had no intention of surrendering to its monopoly. The Elephantine Yahudim were Yahwists who were not going to be held to the letter of observance laid down by Jerusalemites any more than, say, the vast majority of Jews now who believe themselves to be, in their way, observant, will accept instruction on what it means to be Jewish (or worse, who is and who isn’t a Jew) from the ultra-Orthodox.””
About This Quote
Source Article: The Guardian, “The Elephantine Temple and Early Jewish Identity”, 2015
The quote highlights two possible interpretations of an Egyptian YHWH temple: either early Jews were pre‑biblical, lacking Deuteronomy, or they knew Mosaic law but resisted Jerusalem’s monopoly, reflecting diverse early Jewish practice.
In simple terms: Early Egyptian temple shows either limited biblical knowledge or selective observance among Jews.
Recognize that early religious identity can be fluid and locally adapted.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- academic research
- museum curation
- interfaith dialogue
- educational curricula
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How did local contexts shape early Jewish practices?
- What does this suggest about authority and religious conformity?
The evidence is limited and may be contested by other archaeological finds.