Skip to content

Acquire Quote by Robert Fisk

“Wasn't Saddam destroyed? Wasn't Gaddafi liquidated? Didn't Milosevic go to the Hague? All true. But Stalin survived. Kim Jong-un isn't doing too badly, either - though that's probably because he actually has nuclear weapons, as opposed to Iran which might or might not be trying to acquire them and…” quote by Robert Fisk
Download Open image
“Wasn't Saddam destroyed? Wasn't Gaddafi liquidated? Didn't Milosevic go to the Hague? All true. But Stalin survived. Kim Jong-un isn't doing too badly, either - though that's probably because he actually has nuclear weapons, as opposed to Iran which might or might not be trying to acquire them and thus remains on the Israeli-American target list.”

Robert Fisk

4.1 out of 5 (6 ratings)

About This Quote

The quote contrasts the fates of deposed dictators, noting that those without nuclear deterrents face greater risk of removal, while nuclear-armed leaders tend to survive longer.

In simple terms: Nuclear capability influences regime durability.

Key Takeaway

Nuclear weapons can protect leaders from removal.

Themes

Power dynamics Deterrence Authoritarian survival Geopolitics Nuclear proliferation

Mood

Cautious Analytical

Type

Political commentary Historical observation

When to use this quote

  • Analyzing foreign policy
  • Assessing authoritarian risk
  • Studying nuclear negotiations
  • Evaluating diplomatic strategies

Key Concepts

Regime stability International pressure Security dilemmas

Practical Applications

  • Policy risk on nuclear non-proliferation
  • Strategic risk assessment for authoritarian regimes

Questions to Reflect On

  • How does nuclear deterrence affect a dictator's longevity?
  • What are the implications for non-nuclear states?

More by Robert Fisk

Explore all 92 Robert Fisk quotes

More Acquire quotes

Browse all 1,003 Acquire quotes