Equality Quote by Leo Strauss
““But there is a tension between the respect for diversity or individuality and the recognition of natural right. When liberals became impatient of the absolute limits to diversity or individuality that are imposed even by the most liberal version of natural right, they had to make a choice between natural right and the uninhibited cultivation of individuality. They chose the latter. Once this step was taken, tolerance appeared as one value or ideal among many, and not intrinsically superior to its opposite. In other words, intolerance appeared as a value equal in dignity to tolerance. But it is practically impossible to leave it at the equality of all preferences or choices. If the unequal rank of choices cannot be traced to the unequal rank of their objectives, it must be traced to the unequal rank of the acts of choosing; and this means eventually that genuine choice, as distinguished from spurious or despicable choice, is nothing but resolute or deadly serious decision. Such a decision, however, is akin to intolerance rather than to tolerance. Liberal relativism has its roots in the natural right tradition of tolerance or in the notion that everyone has a natural right to the pursuit of happiness as he understands happiness; but in itself it is a seminary of intolerance.””
About This Quote
Source Book: Natural Right and History, 1950
Liberalism’s push for unlimited individuality can erode the principle of tolerance, making intolerance appear equally valid.
In simple terms: Excessive focus on individuality can undermine tolerance.
Balance individual freedom with shared values.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- political discourse
- education policy
- community building
- personal moral decisions
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- Can true tolerance exist without shared standards?
- How do we distinguish genuine choices from harmful ones?
Equality of preferences may ignore deeper moral differences.