Skip to content

Golden opportunity Quote by John Spanier

“Despite its disapproval of Nasser's action and the pro-Soviet direction in which he was leading Egypt, the [Eisenhower] administration saw Nasser's foreign policy as purely a reaction against Israel and Western colonialism. It remained convinced that if Israel had not existed, and if the Arab…” quote by John Spanier
Download Open image
““Despite its disapproval of Nasser's action and the pro-Soviet direction in which he was leading Egypt, the [Eisenhower] administration saw Nasser's foreign policy as purely a reaction against Israel and Western colonialism. It remained convinced that if Israel had not existed, and if the Arab states had not long been dominated by the Western powers, especially Britain, the Arabs would not be anti-Western and pro-Soviet. The administration saw the invasion of Egypt as a golden opportunity to win Arab friendship. American opposition to the invasion, in short, would identify the United States with the anticolonialism of the entire underdeveloped world, and particularly with the anti-Israeli and nationalistic sentiments of the Arab world. At least, that was the rationale for the United States humiliating its two main allies, thereby turning Nasser's military defeat into a political victory. It is ironic in view of America's leading role in halting the attack on Egypt, that it should have been the Soviet Union that was to reap the benefits. Losing Suez resulted in the collapse of British power in the Middle East, the strengthening of Arab nationalism, and the consolidation of Egyptian-Soviet links.””

John Spanier

About This Quote

Source Speech: Eisenhower Administration statements on Suez Crisis, 1956

The US viewed Egypt's actions as a reaction to Western colonialism, seeing the invasion as a chance to gain Arab support, despite opposing its allies and risking anti‑colonial perception.

In simple terms: America saw the crisis as a chance to win Arab favor while condemning colonial powers.

Key Takeaway

Recognize geopolitical motives behind public stances.

Themes

politics colonialism Cold War Middle East alliances

Mood

cautious analytical

Type

historical political

When to use this quote

  • diplomatic negotiations
  • public statements
  • policy analysis
  • historical research

Key Concepts

realpolitik nationalism power dynamics

Questions to Reflect On

  • How did US anti‑colonial rhetoric affect its alliances?
  • What were the long‑term effects on US‑Arab relations?
A Different Perspective

US actions also served Soviet interests, showing limits of influence.

3.6 out of 5 (5 ratings)

More by John Spanier

Explore all 2 John Spanier quotes

More Golden opportunity quotes

Browse all 55 Golden opportunity quotes