Skip to content

Accepted Quote by James L. Buckley

“As a consequence, the Court ruled that the limits on campaign spending violated the First Amendment, but it accepted the $1,000 limit on individual contributions on the ground that the need to avoid the appearance of corruption justified this limited constraint on speech.” quote by James L. Buckley
Download Open image
“As a consequence, the Court ruled that the limits on campaign spending violated the First Amendment, but it accepted the $1,000 limit on individual contributions on the ground that the need to avoid the appearance of corruption justified this limited constraint on speech.”

James L. Buckley

About This Quote

Source Court Opinion, 1976

The Court upheld a modest individual contribution limit to prevent corruption, despite striking down broader spending caps.

In simple terms: Limits on contributions were kept to avoid corruption.

Key Takeaway

Support anti‑corruption measures.

Themes

law ethics campaign finance

Mood

analytical serious

Type

legal political

When to use this quote

  • election campaigns
  • political donations
  • legal advocacy

Key Concepts

First Amendment public trust political integrity

Questions to Reflect On

  • Is a $1,000 limit sufficient?
  • How do we balance speech and corruption risk?
A Different Perspective

Limits may restrict free speech.

5.0 out of 5 (5 ratings)

More by James L. Buckley

Explore all 19 James L. Buckley quotes

More Accepted quotes

Browse all 2,128 Accepted quotes