Nuclear proliferation Quote by Howard Zinn
““To emphasize the heroism of Columbus and his successors as navigators and discoverers, and to deemphasize their genocide, is not a technical necessity but an ideological choice. It serves—unwittingly—to justify what was done. My point is not that we must, in telling history, accuse, judge, condemn Columbus in absentia. It is too late for that; it would be a useless scholarly exercise in morality. But the easy acceptance of atrocities as a deplorable but necessary price to pay for progress (Hiroshima and Vietnam, to save Western civilization; Kronstadt and Hungary, to save socialism; nuclear proliferation, to save us all)—that is still with us. One reason these atrocities are still with us is that we have learned to bury them in a mass of other facts, as radioactive wastes are buried in containers in the earth. We have learned to give them exactly the same proportion of attention that teachers and writers often give them in the most respectable of classrooms and textbooks. This learned sense of moral proportion, coming from the apparent objectivity of the scholar, is accepted more easily than when it comes from politicians at press conferences. It is therefore more deadly.””
About This Quote
Source Essay: A People’s History of the United States, 1980
Historical narratives often downplay atrocities to justify progress, shaping collective memory.
In simple terms: History can be selective, masking crimes.
Question dominant narratives and seek fuller truth.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- education
- media
- political discourse
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How does selective history affect identity?
- What responsibilities do scholars have in truth‑telling?
Ignoring past crimes can repeat them.