Assuming Quote by Daniel Byman
“We've seen a shift where people were often initially reluctant to call things terrorism until they knew for sure. And now they start out assuming it's terrorism and then work backwards and say it may or may not have been terrorism. And it does matter tremendously because of the resources involved. If it's a crime that's seen as a disturbed individual, then local police will handle it. If it's a crime that's seen as someone who might be linked to an international terrorist group, you get the vast federal U.S. national security bureaucracy as well as tremendous political attention.”
About This Quote
Source Interview: Counterterrorism Strategies, Daniel Byman, 2020
People’s labeling of violent acts shifts from cautious to immediate terrorism classification, affecting resource allocation and political focus.
In simple terms: Labeling violence as terrorism changes how it’s handled.
Assess threats before assigning labels.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- law enforcement
- policy making
- media reporting
- public debate
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- What criteria should define terrorism?
- How does labeling affect victims and communities?
Premature labeling can lead to misallocation of resources and civil liberty concerns.