Hunger strike Quote by Arundhati Roy
““Not everyone in the village was happy with the idea of having an Untouchable man's statue put up at the entrance. Particularly not an Untouchable who carried a weapon. They felt it would give out the wrong message, give people ideas. Three weeks after the statue went up, the rifle on its soldier went missing. Sepoy S. Murugesan's family tried to file a complaint, but the police refused to register a case, saying that the rifle must have fallen off or simply disintegrated due to the use of substandard cement- a fairly common malpractice- and that nobody could be blamed. A month later the statue's hands were cut off. Once again the police refused to register a case, although this time they sniggered knowingly and did not even bother to offer a reason. Two weeks after the amputation of its hands, the statue of Sepoy S. Murugesan was beheaded. There were a few days of tension. People from nearby villages who belonged to the same caste as S. Murugesan organized a protest. They began a relay hunger strike at the base of the statue. A local court said it would constitute a magisterial committee to look into the matter. In the meanwhile it ordered a status quo. The hunger strike was discontinued. The magisterial committee was never constituted. In some countries, some soldiers die twice.””
About This Quote
Source Novel: The God of Small Things by Arundhati Roy, 1997
Caste oppression and state neglect enable systematic violence against marginalized symbols.
In simple terms: Caste bias leads to ignored crimes.
Challenge systemic injustice.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- public monuments
- legal inaction
- community protest
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- Why do authorities ignore such crimes?
- How can marginalized voices be amplified?
Change may be slow and resisted.