Ethics Quote by Alasdair MacIntyre
““Analytic philosophy, that is to say, can very occasionally produce practically conclusive results of a negative kind. It can show in a few cases that just too much incoherence and inconsistency is involved in some position for any reasonable person to continue to hold it. But it can never establish the rational acceptability of any particular position in cases where each of the alternative rival positions available has sufficient range and scope and the adherents of each are willing to pay the price necessary to secure coherence and consistency. Hence the peculiar flavor of so much contemporary analytic writing—by writers less philosophically self-aware than Rorty or Lewis—in which passages of argument in which the most sophisticated logical and semantic techniques available are deployed in order to secure maximal rigor alternate with passages which seem to do no more than cobble together a set of loosely related arbitrary preferences; contemporary analytic philosophy exhibits a strange partnership between an idiom deeply indebted to Frege and Carnap and one deriving from the more simple-minded forms of existentialism””
About This Quote
Source Book: After Virtue, Alasdair MacIntyre, 1981
Analytic philosophy can sometimes refute incoherent positions but cannot prove any single view when alternatives are equally coherent.
In simple terms: It can show bad arguments but not prove the best one.
Recognize limits of logical analysis in deep disputes.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- academic debates
- ethical theory formulation
- policy analysis
- philosophical education
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How do we choose between equally coherent theories?
- When should we prioritize practical consequences over logical consistency?
Logical rigor may overlook lived experience and moral intuition.