Napster is essentially using the music to make money for themselves and that's the part that's both morally and legally wrong. That I think is more relevant than whether or not I'm losing money. — Hilary Rosen Copy Share Image
Music has an intrinsic value that touches Americans - they love their music, and want more. — Hilary Rosen Copy Share Image
For music, unlike a $500 software program, people are paying a buck or two a song, and it's those dollars and pennies that have… — Hilary Rosen Copy Share Image
The Constitution wanted artists to have control over their works because they knew it would create incentive to create more works. That is clearly… — Hilary Rosen Copy Share Image
We are going after a targeted group of businesses that are creating opportunities for themselves using other people's property. The Internet has very little… — Hilary Rosen Copy Share Image
I don't have any illusions that what we are doing is sticking the the bottle. I don't think that's what we are doing. We are trying to make sure that the genie has friends, has food to eat, a way to grow. — Hilary Rosen Copy Share
A protracted legislative fight will not move us closer to where the music industry wants to be - delivering music to fans through a… — Hilary Rosen Copy Share Image
There's something much more fundamental about Mitt Romney. He seems so old-fashioned when it comes to women, and I think that comes across, and… — Hilary Rosen Copy Share Image
There is no sense in owning the copyright unless you are going to use it. I don't think anyone wants to hold all of… — Hilary Rosen Copy Share Image
The marketplace can handle this. The laws are there. The courts have shown a consistent ability to find a balance between copyright owners and… — Hilary Rosen Copy Share Image
There are some very real areas where working together is critical, whether it's talking about public policy issues, enforcement, or how to work together… — Hilary Rosen Copy Share Image
