rBGH poses an even greater risk to human health than ever considered. The FDA and Monsanto have a lot to answer for. Given the cancer risks, and other health concerns, why is rBGH milk still on the market? — Samuel Epstein Copy Share Image
NCI now actually anticipates further increases, and not decreases, in cancer mortality rates, from 171/100,000 in 1984 to 175/100,000 by the year 2000! — Samuel Epstein Copy Share
We are losing the war against cancer. The prohibition of new carcinogenic products, reduction of toxins in use, and right-to-know laws - these are… — Samuel Epstein Copy Share
We are losing the war against cancer... I would like to offer for your consideration the following legislative proposals on the following topics: prohibition… — Samuel Epstein Copy Share
We are not dealing with a scientific problem. We are dealing with a political issue. — Samuel Epstein Copy Share
...The asbestos industry...has for decades successfully suppressed and manipulated information on the carcinogenicity and other hazards of asbestos. Involved in this conspiracy network were… — Samuel Epstein Copy Share
rBGH poses an even greater risk to human health than ever considered. The FDA and Monsanto have a lot to answer for. Given the… — Samuel Epstein Copy Share
