If people are going to do post-publication peer review, they need to abide by the same rules as they abide by for pre-publication peer review: not being ad hominem, being respectful, giving the author a chance to respond in a… — Susan Fiske Copy Share Image
If people are going to do post-publication peer review, they need to abide by the same rules as they abide by for pre-publication peer… — Susan Fiske Copy Share
In these unfiltered, un-moderated social media posts people are speculating about others' motivations. And you could no more put that in a peer review… — Susan Fiske Copy Share
If you are doing a peer review of somebody's paper before publication, the editor would not allow you to speculate about the person's motives,… — Susan Fiske Copy Share
Promoting open and critical and respectful scientific discourse seems like a pretty good goal to me. — Susan Fiske Copy Share
If you have an effect that nobody can replicate, then your phenomenon fades away. So if you want to to have a legacy, then… — Susan Fiske Copy Share
I think there's a huge difference between describing norms in a vivid way and singling out individual people. — Susan Fiske Copy Share
Some people have set up sort of "gotcha" algorithms that apparently crawl through psychology articles and look for fraudulent p-values [a measure of the… — Susan Fiske Copy Share
