Skip to content

adult men enjoy having sex with one another, and they…

“adult men enjoy having sex with one another, and they don’t harm anyone while doing so, why should it be wrong, and why should we outlaw it? It is a private matter between these two men, and they are free to decide about it according to their own personal feelings. If in the Middle Ages two men…” quote by Yuval Noah Harari
Download Open image
““adult men enjoy having sex with one another, and they don’t harm anyone while doing so, why should it be wrong, and why should we outlaw it? It is a private matter between these two men, and they are free to decide about it according to their own personal feelings. If in the Middle Ages two men confessed to a priest that they were in love with one another, and that they had never felt so happy, their good feelings would not have changed the priest’s damning judgement – indeed, their lack of guilt would only have worsened the situation. Today, in contrast, if two men are in love, they are told: ‘If it feels good – do it! Don’t let any priest mess with your mind. Just follow your heart. You know best what’s good for you.’ Interestingly enough, today even religious zealots adopt this humanistic discourse when they want to influence public opinion. For example, every year for the past decade the Israeli LGBT community has held a gay pride parade in the streets of Jerusalem. It’s a unique day of harmony in this conflict-riven city, because it is the one occasion when religious Jews, Muslims and Christians suddenly find a common cause – they all fume in accord against the gay parade. What’s really interesting, though, is the argument they use. They don’t say, ‘These sinners shouldn’t hold a gay parade because God forbids homosexuality.’ Rather, they explain to every available microphone and TV camera that ‘seeing a gay parade passing through the holy city of Jerusalem hurts our feelings. Just as gay people want us to respect their feelings, they should respect ours.’ On 7 January 2015 Muslim fanatics massacred several staff members of the French magazine Charlie Hebdo, because the magazine published caricatures of the prophet Muhammad. In the following days, many Muslim organisations condemned the attack, yet some could not resist adding a ‘but’ clause. For example, the Egyptian Journalists Syndicate denounced the terrorists for their use of violence, but in the same breath denounced the magazine for ‘hurting the feelings of millions of Muslims across the world’.2 Note that the Syndicate did not blame the magazine for disobeying God’s will. That’s what we call progress.””

Yuval Noah Harari

About This Quote

This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.

The passage critiques how moral arguments are often framed around personal feelings rather than consistent ethical principles, highlighting hypocrisy in societal reactions to LGBT visibility.

In simple terms: It points out the inconsistency in moral reasoning about personal freedoms.

Key Takeaway

Question the basis of moral judgments.

Themes

hypocrisy morality freedom

Mood

critical thoughtful

Type

analytical philosophical

When to use this quote

  • public debates
  • pride parades
  • religious discourse
  • media narratives

Key Concepts

ethical relativism social conformity

Questions to Reflect On

  • How do personal feelings shape public policy?
  • Can feelings be a reliable moral guide?
A Different Perspective

Moral arguments based on feelings can be manipulated to justify prejudice.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ No ratings yet

More by Yuval Noah Harari

Explore all 1,200 Yuval Noah Harari quotes

More Follow your heart quotes

Browse all 677 Follow your heart quotes