Skip to content

Was it the wicked leaders who led innocent populations to…

“Was it the wicked leaders who led innocent populations to slaughter, or was it wicked populations who chose leaders after their own hears? On the face of it, it seemed unlikely that one Leader could force a million Englishmen against their will. If, for instance, Mordred had been anxious to make…” quote by T.H. White
Download Open image
““Was it the wicked leaders who led innocent populations to slaughter, or was it wicked populations who chose leaders after their own hears? On the face of it, it seemed unlikely that one Leader could force a million Englishmen against their will. If, for instance, Mordred had been anxious to make the English wear petticoats, or stand on their heads, they would surely not have joined his party -- however clever or persuasive or deceitful or even terrible his inducements? A leader was surely forced to offer something which appealed to those he led? He might give the impetus to the falling building, but surely it had to be toppling on its own account before it fell? If this were true, then wars were not calamities into which amiable innocents were led by evil men.They were national movements, deeper, more subtle in origin. And, indeed, it did not feel to him as if he or Mordred had led their country to its misery. If it was so easy to lead one's country in various directions, as if she was a pig on a string, why had he failed to lead her into chivalry, into justice, and into peace? He had been trying. Then again -- this was the second circle -- it was like the Inferno -- if neither he nor Mordred had really set the misery in motion, who had been the cause? How did the fact of war begin in general? For any one war seemed so rooted in its antecedents. Mordred went back to Morgause, Morgause to Uther Pendragon, Uther to his ancestors. It seemed as if Cain had slain Abel, seizing his country, after which the men of Abel had sought to win their patrimony again for ever. Man had gone on, through age after age, avenging wrong with wrong, slaughter with slaughter. Nobody was the better for it, since both sides always suffered, yet everybody was inextricable. The present war might be attributed to Mordred or to himself. But also it was due to a million Thrashers, to Lancelot, Guenever, Gawaine, everybody. Those who lived by the sword were forced to die by it. It was as if everything would lead to sorrow, so long as man refused to forget the past. The wrongs of Uther and of Cain were wrongs which could have been righted only by the blessing of forgetting them.””

T.H. White

About This Quote

This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.

War arises from complex social and psychological forces, not merely from evil leaders or populations; responsibility is shared across history and individuals.

In simple terms: War is caused by many intertwined causes, not just leaders.

Key Takeaway

Recognize shared responsibility in conflict.

Themes

history responsibility human nature war leadership

Mood

reflective thoughtful

Type

philosophical historical

When to use this quote

  • political analysis
  • educational curricula
  • peacebuilding
  • conflict resolution

Key Concepts

collective causation moral ambiguity historical cycles

Questions to Reflect On

  • How do societal values shape the likelihood of war?
  • What role do ordinary citizens play in escalating conflict?
A Different Perspective

Leaders alone cannot be blamed; systemic factors matter.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ No ratings yet

More by T.H. White

Explore all 107 T.H. White quotes

More Forget the past quotes

Browse all 885 Forget the past quotes