What about animals slaughtered for our consumption? who…
““What about animals slaughtered for our consumption? who among us would be able to continue eating pork chops after visiting a factory farm in which pigs are half-blind and cannot even properly walk, but are just fattened to be killed? And what about, say, torture and suffering of millions we know about, but choose to ignore? Imagine the effect of having to watch a snuff movie portraying what goes on thousands of times a day around the world: brutal acts of torture, the picking out of eyes, the crushing of testicles -the list cannot bear recounting. Would the watcher be able to continue going on as usual? Yes, but only if he or she were able somehow to forget -in an act which suspended symbolic efficiency -what had been witnessed. This forgetting entails a gesture of what is called fetishist disavowal: "I know it, but I don't want to know that I know, so I don't know." I know it, but I refuse to fully assume the consequences of this knowledge, so that I can continue acting as if I don't know it.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The quote argues that people avoid confronting brutal realities by willfully forgetting or disavowing them, allowing them to continue harmful practices without moral discomfort.
In simple terms: People ignore cruelty by pretending not to see it.
Recognize and confront uncomfortable truths.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- dietary choices
- animal rights activism
- media consumption
- political advocacy
- education programs
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How do you rationalize everyday actions that cause harm?
- Can societal change occur without confronting uncomfortable truths?
The argument may oversimplify complex social and economic factors that limit individual agency.