[Dr. Constain James] refuted so well the aberrations of…
“[Dr. Constain James] refuted so well the aberrations of Darwinism… [A system] which is repugnant at once to history, to the tradition of all people, to exact science, to observed facts, and even to reason itself, would seem to need no refutation. But the corruption of this age, the machinations of the perverse, the danger of the simple, demand that such fancies, altogether absurd though they are, should - since they borrow the mask of science - be refuted by true science.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The argument claims Darwinism contradicts history, tradition, science, and reason, demanding refutation by true science.
In simple terms: Darwinism is presented as incompatible with multiple domains, needing scientific rebuttal.
Critically evaluate scientific claims against broader knowledge.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- academic debate
- religious education
- public policy
- media discourse
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- Can scientific and religious explanations be reconciled?
- What criteria determine a claim’s scientific validity?
Science and faith can coexist; the dichotomy may be overstated.