. . . we come astonishingly close to the mystical beliefs…
““. . . we come astonishingly close to the mystical beliefs of Pythagoras and his followers who attempted to submit all of life to the sovereignty of numbers. Many of our psychologists, sociologists, economists and other latter-day cabalists will have numbers to tell them the truth or they will have nothing. . . . We must remember that Galileo merely said that the language of nature is written in mathematics. He did not say that everything is. And even the truth about nature need not be expressed in mathematics. For most of human history, the language of nature has been the language of myth and ritual. These forms, one might add, had the virtues of leaving nature unthreatened and of encouraging the belief that human beings are part of it. It hardly befits a people who stand ready to blow up the planet to praise themselves too vigorously for having found the true way to talk about nature.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The quote warns against over‑reliance on numbers and mathematical language to explain everything, noting that myth and ritual once protected nature and humility.
In simple terms: Beware treating numbers as the sole truth about nature.
Balance data with narrative and respect for the natural world.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- policy making
- environmental activism
- education curricula
- media analysis
- public discourse
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How can we integrate quantitative data with qualitative insight?
- What role should myth play in modern environmental ethics?
Numbers cannot capture all aspects of reality, especially ethical and aesthetic dimensions.