I do not believe that an “impulse to knowledge” is the…
““I do not believe that an “impulse to knowledge” is the father of philosophy; but that another impulse, here as elsewhere, has only made use of knowledge (and mistaken knowledge!) as an instrument.But whoever considers the fundamental impulses of man with a view to determining how far they may have here acted as INSPIRING GENII (or as demons and cobolds), will find that they have all practiced philosophy at one time or another, and that each one of them would have been only too glad to look upon itself as the ultimate end of existence and the legitimate LORD over all the other impulses.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Philosophy is driven not by pure curiosity but by using knowledge as a tool for deeper impulses, which can become self‑serving or tyrannical.
In simple terms: Knowledge is a tool for deeper motives, not pure curiosity.
Key Takeaway
Examine what drives your quest for truth.
Themes
philosophy
human nature
power
self‑interest
knowledge
Mood
reflective
critical
thoughtful
Type
philosophical
analytical
When to use this quote
- academic research
- personal growth
- political rhetoric
- spiritual practice
- creative work
Key Concepts
instrumentalism
ego
existentialism
Questions to Reflect On
- What hidden motives shape your pursuit of knowledge?
- How can you keep curiosity free from self‑service?
A Different Perspective
The impulse to know can become a justification for domination, limiting true inquiry.