Moreover, we look in vain to philosophy for the answer to…
““Moreover, we look in vain to philosophy for the answer to the great riddle. Despite its noble purpose and history, pure philosophy long ago abandoned the foundational questions about human existence. The question itself is a reputation killer. It has become a Gorgon for philosophers, upon whose visage even the best thinkers fear to gaze. They have good reason for their aversion. Most of the history of philosophy consists of failed models of the mind. The field of discourse is strewn with the wreckage of theories of consciousness. After the decline of logical positivism in the middle of the twentieth century, and the attempt of this movement to blend science and logic into a closed system, professional philosophers dispersed in an intellectual diaspora. They emigrated into the more tractable disciplines not yet colonized by science – intellectual history, semantics, logic, foundational mathematics, ethics, theology, and, most lucratively, problems of personal life adjustment. Philosophers flourish in these various endeavors, but for the time being, at least, and by a process of elimination, the solution of the riddle has been left to science. What science promises, and has already supplied in part, is the following. There is a real creation story of humanity, and one only, and it is not a myth. It is being worked out and tested, and enriched and strengthened, step by step. (9-10)””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Philosophy has retreated from life's big questions, leaving science to construct humanity's origin story, which is gradually refined.
In simple terms: Science now tackles humanity's origins as philosophy steps back.
Trust scientific progress on humanity's story.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- academic debates
- public understanding
- educational curricula
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How can philosophy and science collaborate on existential questions?
- What limits does science face in explaining consciousness?
Philosophy still offers critical perspectives on meaning.