the wilderness should be preserved for political reasons…
““the wilderness should be preserved for political reasons. We may need it someday not only as a refuge from excessive industrialism but also as a refuge from authoritarian government, from political oppression. Grand Canyon, Big Bend, Yellowstone, and the High Sierras may be required to function as bases for guerrilla warfare against tyranny...The value of wilderness, on the other hand, as a base for resistance to centralized domination is demonstrated by recent history. In Budapest and Santo Domingo, for example, popular revolts were easily and quickly crushed because an urbanized environment gives the advantage to the power with technological equipment. But in Cuba, Algeria, and Vietnam the revolutionaries, operating in mountain, desert, and jungle hinterlands with the active or tacit support of a thinly dispersed population, have been able to overcome or at least fight to a draw official establishment forces equipped with all of the terrible weapons of twentieth century militarism.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Wilderness can serve as a strategic sanctuary against oppressive regimes and industrial overreach, offering terrain for resistance and guerrilla tactics.
In simple terms: Nature can protect freedom and aid rebellion against tyranny.
Preserve wild lands for ecological and political resilience.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- activist movements
- climate protests
- community land trusts
- defense planning
- historical case studies
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- How can societies balance ecological preservation with political utility?
- What modern threats could wilderness help mitigate?
Wilderness alone cannot guarantee success without organized strategy and popular support.