I had in mind going worse than waterboarding. It's enough…
“I had in mind going worse than waterboarding. It's enough. We have right now a country that's under siege. It's under siege from a people, from - we're like living in medieval times. If I have it to do and if it's up to me, I would absolutely bring back waterboarding. And if it's going to be tougher than waterboarding, I would bring that back, too.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
He argues that extreme interrogation methods are justified to protect the nation under perceived threat.
In simple terms: Extreme measures are needed for security.
Key Takeaway
Consider moral costs of harsh tactics.
Themes
security
ethics
politics
leadership
human rights
Mood
tense
controversial
Type
political
provocative
When to use this quote
- counterterrorism policy
- law enforcement training
- public debate on torture
- legislative hearings
Key Concepts
authoritarianism
nationalism
utilitarianism
Questions to Reflect On
- Is security worth compromising human dignity?
- What alternatives exist to protect citizens?
A Different Perspective
Such tactics may violate international law and erode moral authority.