It is not contrary to reason to prefer the destruction of…
“It is not contrary to reason to prefer the destruction of the whole world to the scratching of my finger. It is not contrary to reason for me to choose my total ruin, to prevent the least uneasiness of an Indian, or person wholly unknown to me. It is as little contrary to reason to prefer even my own acknowledged lesser good to my greater, and have a more ardent affection for the former than the latter.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Reason can justify extreme self‑sacrifice for trivial comforts of others, showing moral paradoxes in rational choice.
In simple terms: Reason can justify extreme self‑sacrifice for trivial comforts of others.
Key Takeaway
Recognize when rational arguments ignore broader consequences.
Themes
morality
reason
self‑sacrifice
paradox
Mood
conflicted
thoughtful
Type
philosophical
ethical
When to use this quote
- political debate
- personal sacrifice
- public policy decisions
Key Concepts
ethical theory
rational choice
moral psychology
Questions to Reflect On
- What limits should rational self‑sacrifice have?
- When does personal comfort outweigh collective good?
A Different Perspective
Rational justification may overlook long‑term societal harm.