Skip to content

As Jeremy Bentham had asked about animals well over two…

“As Jeremy Bentham had asked about animals well over two hundred years ago, the question was not whether they could reason or talk, but could they suffer? And yet, somehow, it seemed to take more imagination for humans to identify with animal suffering than it did to conceive of space flight or…” quote by Chris Bohjalian
Download Open image
“As Jeremy Bentham had asked about animals well over two hundred years ago, the question was not whether they could reason or talk, but could they suffer? And yet, somehow, it seemed to take more imagination for humans to identify with animal suffering than it did to conceive of space flight or cloning or nuclear fusion. Yes, she was a fanatic in the eyes of most of the country. . .Mostly, however, she just lacked patience for people who wouldn't accept her belief that humans inflicted needless agony on the animals around them, and they did so in numbers that were absolutely staggering.”

Chris Bohjalian

About This Quote

This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.

The quote argues that recognizing animal suffering requires more imagination than many scientific feats, highlighting human moral blindness.

In simple terms: Seeing animal pain needs more imagination than tech advances.

Key Takeaway

Expand empathy toward all sentient beings.

Themes

ethics animal rights imagination

Mood

concerned thoughtful

Type

ethical activist

When to use this quote

  • activism
  • dietary choices
  • policy advocacy
  • education programs

Key Concepts

moral philosophy speciesism

Questions to Reflect On

  • How can we cultivate imagination for suffering?
  • What barriers prevent empathy for animals?
A Different Perspective

Human self‑interest often blocks empathy.

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ No ratings yet

More by Chris Bohjalian

Explore all 82 Chris Bohjalian quotes

More Accepting quotes

Browse all 6,788 Accepting quotes