The new advocates of ID [Intelligent Design] ask that…
![“The new advocates of ID [Intelligent Design] ask that their ideas be judged by scientific, not religious, criteria. OK, let's see how well ID stacks up as a scientific alternative to Darwinism. To gauge how well ID is doing as a platform for scientific research, I logged into the best database of…” quote by Chet Raymo](https://sms4smile.com/q/i/f5c/chet-raymo-34749_alternatives_the-new-advocates-of-id-intelligent-desi_3232484.png)
“The new advocates of ID [Intelligent Design] ask that their ideas be judged by scientific, not religious, criteria. OK, let's see how well ID stacks up as a scientific alternative to Darwinism. To gauge how well ID is doing as a platform for scientific research, I logged into the best database of the biological literature. A search for keyword ''evolution'' yielded 24,000 hits in the last decade. A search for ''intelligent design'' yielded not a single piece of research. Evolution by natural selection remains the basis of every successful biological research program.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The author highlights the lack of peer‑reviewed research supporting Intelligent Design, contrasting it with the extensive literature on evolution, suggesting ID fails as a scientific framework.
In simple terms: ID lacks scientific evidence compared to evolution.
Key Takeaway
Demand evidence for scientific claims.
Themes
science
skepticism
education
religion
evolution
Mood
skeptical
inquisitive
Type
scientific
critical
When to use this quote
- academic research
- curriculum development
- public science communication
- policy making
- religious discourse
Key Concepts
scientific method
burden of proof
Questions to Reflect On
- What standards should define scientific legitimacy?
- How can science education address such gaps?
A Different Perspective
ID proponents may claim non‑empirical value, which the author dismisses.