My argument against God was that the universe seemed so…
““My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust? If the whole show was bad and senseless from A to Z, so to speak, why did I, who was supposed to be part of the show, find myself in such a violent reaction against it?... Of course I could have given up my idea of justice by saying it was nothing but a private idea of my own. But if i did that, then my argument against God collapsed too--for the argument depended on saying the world was really unjust, not simply that it did not happen to please my fancies. Thus, in the very act of trying to prove that God did not exist - in other words, that the whole of reality was senseless - I found I was forced to assume that one part of reality - namely my idea of justice - was full of sense. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never have known it was dark. Dark would be without meaning.””
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
Questions the basis of labeling the universe unjust, showing that concepts of justice require a reference point, and that meaning emerges from our own standards.
In simple terms: Justice needs a standard; meaning is subjective.
Recognize your own value judgments.
Themes
Mood
Type
When to use this quote
- ethical debates
- personal crisis
- academic study
- spiritual inquiry
Key Concepts
Questions to Reflect On
- What standards do you use to judge fairness?
- Can meaning exist without a universal reference?
If meaning is purely subjective, shared purpose may be hard to establish.