My one and only piece of relevant evidence [for an…
![“My one and only piece of relevant evidence [for an Aristotelian God] is the apparent impossibility of providing a naturalistic theory of the origin from DNA of the first reproducing species ... [In fact] the only reason which I have for beginning to think of believing in a First Cause god is the…” quote by Antony Flew](https://sms4smile.com/q/img-quotes/195/antony-flew-26504_accounts_my-one-and-only-piece-of-relevant-eviden_2532987.png)
“My one and only piece of relevant evidence [for an Aristotelian God] is the apparent impossibility of providing a naturalistic theory of the origin from DNA of the first reproducing species ... [In fact] the only reason which I have for beginning to think of believing in a First Cause god is the impossibility of providing a naturalistic account of the origin of the first reproducing organisms.”
About This Quote
This interpretation was drafted with AI assistance. It is one reading of the quote, not the author's own explanation.
The quote argues that the lack of a naturalistic explanation for the origin of DNA‑based life points to a First Cause or divine creator.
In simple terms: No natural theory explains DNA origins, suggesting a creator.
Key Takeaway
Consider the limits of scientific explanations for life's beginnings.
Themes
philosophy
theology
science
origin
causality
Mood
thoughtful
inquisitive
skeptical
Type
argumentative
reflective
theological
When to use this quote
- academic debate
- personal belief
- science education
- public policy
- interfaith dialogue
Key Concepts
first cause
teleology
epistemic limits
Questions to Reflect On
- What evidence would change your view on a First Cause?
- How do you balance faith and scientific inquiry?
A Different Perspective
Science may eventually provide naturalistic explanations, reducing the need for a divine cause.